The reality of our Flat, Non Rotating Realm - The Greatest Lie

It’s truly amazing that this spinning ball covered in curved water fairy tale is still being accepted by the teeming masses. This heliocentric bullshit story which is costing trillions to prop up should have been called out long ago. Anyone who cares to do a little due diligence will quickly discover that we are absolutely not spinning at over 1600kph at the equator but we are in fact fixed and unmoving. The satan worshipping ‘priests’ are hiding GOD - we are inhabiting a sacred realm. Those of us who discovered the truth a long while ago did not just pick up some radical theory and adopt it - we did the ‘work’ and found that the truth released a huge weight that we had carried for as long as we could remember. Once the veil was lifted from our eyes, we were able to see everything with total clarity - you finally understand that we are the centre of everything and that God is close at hand - there is nothing within this magical realm that cant be fixed in a flash. However, we also discover that good and evil - the yin and yang - duality exist and currently we are seeing the final battles being waged by the satanic forces who’s time is at an end - we have lived our lifetimes under the illusion of freedom but have never known freedom. This is about to change.

7 Likes

3 Likes

@Kidkip

I am interested in issues related to Firnment.

Since we can’t go beyond Firnament and every attempt ends like in the video below.:down_arrow:

How do objects fly into us from the other side of the Firnment ? :down_arrow:

2 Likes

Well the first vid with the ‘rocket’ looks to be totally fake - just my take - something about it looks ‘off’ …but, if its not, then it just shows a rocket meeting the firmament. The second vid created a blast wave - so we were told but nobody knows exactly what it was. You have to keep in mind …WE DO NOT RESIDE ON A SPINNING BALL WITH CURVED WATER. This is a sacred REALM …it is NOT a chunk of rock. We exist in material form inside of a ‘closed system’ and, because of that ANYTHING can be made to happen inside this closed system ….so its likely that the lights in the sky (like this impressive specimen) are the result of some sort of frequency modulation - the reason as to why they appear is unknown to us in our present mode. We currently exist in a low vibration plane and those who worship the dark energies have made sure we stay there - they are hiding God and hiding the truth of our reality. So - do things come into our material realm from the otherwise of the firmament - bearing in mind that we have waters above the firmament - how does anyone know. But, because of the truly magical nature of this place we inhabit, anything can be made to happen within our closed system - and likely, we aint seen nothing yet.

2 Likes

While I am convinced that the official narrative about earth pyramids antarctica moon space may be full of coverups, the flat earth has a big flaw that you can’t escape. The southern hemisphere, or as you would call it, the external part of the disc, is TOO SIMILAR to the northern one. To achieve this similarity the sun NOT ONLY must make the nonsensical travel between the tropics, but change SPEED, INTENSITY OF IRRADIATION and probably SIZE, all to make the day similar in the south as it is in the north. Now, either you assume you are a star of the truman show or the fact that you can’t tell whether you are in brazil or in europe simply from the enormous geometric difference between the two positions, declares flat earth as false.

4 Likes

I don’t know if this video is fake, it was shown on all TV media, it was about a year ago.

Yes, I know, I’m a flat earther.

Unfortunately, I don’t understand everything and I can’t explain everything, so I ask people who have a similar opinion about the shape of the earth.

2 Likes

The sun has 3 main trajectories.

  • One near the North Pole, which is the center of the Earth, the Arctic Circle.

  • The second one is the Tropic of Cancer.

  • The third is the Tropic of Capricorn.

This is how we have different seasons.
When it is summer in Europe, the sun is close to the North Pole and conversely, when it is winter, it is located at the Tropic of Capricorn.

All this affects daylight, and the brightness is modified depending on its position.

2 Likes

Scientists and astronomers all say the earth is a sphere, but if it’s really flat, what’s their motive for lying to us?

2 Likes

The flat Earth was created by God, the spherical Earth is the work of Satan. Separation of people from the truth, i.e. from God.

Besides, it’s a good deal:
NASA’s annual budget is variable but amounts to tens of billions of dollars; for example, the proposed budget for fiscal year 2024 was $27.2 billion (approximately $75.5 million per day).

All ancient civilizations knew that the Earth was flat and surrounded by a dome from which you could never leave. Therefore, space does not exist as NASA depicts it.




1 Like

3 Likes

Materialism. If you believe everything is material, then everything is finite, scarcity. If you believe in the materialism of the current scientific model then you believe earthquakes are random incidences of tectonic plates and not planned HAARP usage and Directed Energy Weapons. If you think you are on a speck of dust spinning through galaxy then your life is meaningless and you act accordingly.

3 Likes

Canadians’ experiences with the curvature of the Earth. :down_arrow:

The guy explains what meteorites falling from the sky are. This ball is called coils, which people find all over the world.

He compares it to a car cigarette lighter that heats up due to electricity. The balls pass through the atmosphere (the atmosphere is naturally electrically charged) and heat up as they fall.
They are supposed to fall into bodies of water, but sometimes they veer off course and end up in fields.
He compares it to fireworks. :down_arrow:

This is the first time I’ve come across such a theory. It is not perfect, because although it is technologically possible in the modern world, it does not explain these phenomena in ancient times. What do you think?

Flat Earth mechanics :down_arrow:

1 Like

How odd NASA would do such research?

2 Likes

See that’s where you and so many other mind controlled punters get things sooooo wrong - they start out with the assumption that they know what the sun is and what the moon is and how it travels and use that to debunk the FE. What needs to be understood is that this thing we reside in is a sacred REALM ….NOTHING is as the freemasonic nasa cabal would have us believe. Start with the fact that we can easily prove this aint no spinning ball with curved water - then assume that EVERYTHING we thought we knew has to be re-examined. When you understand the lie we have lived our lives under, your perspective about EVERYTHING changes - you can float above it all and clearly see all their moves almost before they make them.

2 Likes

So this is what I came across and am sharing it here:

In early times, people believed that the earth was flat. For centuries, men were afraid to venture out too far, for fear of falling off the edge! Sir Francis Drake was the first person who proved that the earth is spherical when he sailed around it in 1597.

AI Overview

Sir Francis Drake didn’t prove the Earth was round; rather, his famous 1577-1580 circumnavigation (sailing around the world) provided powerful, practical demonstration that the Earth was indeed spherical, completing the journey by starting west and returning east, a feat impossible on a flat plane, reinforcing ancient knowledge that ships disappear hull-first over the horizon, as noted by The Library of Congress.

Thomas Cavendish (1560-92), Sir Francis Drake (1540-96), and Sir John Hawkins (1532-95)

May we all be Guided.

1 Like

The SHAPE OF THE EARTH IS SPHERICAL

Consider the following Qur’anic verse regarding the alternation of day and night:

{ Do you not see that God causes the night to enter the day and causes the day to enter the night and has subjected the sun and the moon, each running [its course] for a specified term, and that God, with whatever you do, is Acquainted? }

[Al-Qur’an Surah 31 (Chapter: Luqmaan) : Verse 29]

Merging here means that the night slowly and gradually changes to day and vice versa.

This phenomenon can only take place if the earth is spherical.

If the earth was flat, there would have been a sudden change from night to day and from day to night.

The following verse also alludes to the spherical shape of the earth:

{ He created the heavens and earth in truth. He wraps the night over the day and wraps the day over the night and has subjected the sun and the moon, each running [its course] for a specified term. Unquestionably, He is the Exalted in Might, the Perpetual Forgiver.}

[Al-Qur’an Surah 39 Az Zumar (Chapter 39: The Groups): Verse 5]

The Arabic word used here is Kawwara meaning ‘to overlap’ or ‘to coil’– the way a turban is wound around the head.

The overlapping or coiling of the day and night can only take place if the earth is spherical.

The earth is not exactly round like a ball, but geo-spherical, i.e. it is flattened at the poles.

The following verse contains a description of the earth’s shape:

{ And after that He spread the earth.}

[Al-Qur’an Surah 79, An Naziat (Chapter 79: Those who pull out): Verse 30]

The Arabic word for egg here is ‘Dahaahaa’ which means an ostrich-egg.

The shape of an ostrich-egg resembles the geo-spherical shape of the earth.

Thus the Qur’an correctly describes the shape of the earth, though the prevalent notion when the Qur’an was revealed was that the earth was flat.

May we all remain Guided.

3 Likes

Its mind boggling that you and others of your ilk live in a constant state of cognitive dissonance - its there right in front of you but somehow you cant see the ‘wood for the trees’. EVERY so called ‘round the world’ or ‘round the globe’ nautical adventure does exactly the same thing with variations - proving nothing apart from a route travelling west/east or east/west. IF the earth was a spinning ball with curved water ..OH, yes, and GRAVITY to hold all that water from flying off into ‘space’ hahaha …then, somehow all these nautical types sailed just like you believe (incorrectly). Of course, those satan worshipping freemasons who currently run the show have been showing us the truth of the FE for years - do yourself a favour and look at the picture of the UN logo which is the FE map divided into 33 sections. Then retrace ANY ‘round the globe’ voyage - including that of Drake on the FE map ….its not rocket science ..even those with terminal cognitive dissonance can do it. Now try and convince me how these voyages are ‘an impossible feat on a flat plane’. Pleeeeze do a little due diligence …without providing nasa fairy tales as evidence.

2 Likes

Again - you come at this with interpretation based on your incorrect beliefs … the sun and moon move as the yin and the yang and move out of sight as a result of perspective - I’ll say it again ….PERSPECTIVE ..its really simple but the satanic/freemasonic priests have sold us a total bullshit story. Please do some serious research without resorting to AI - you should know by now that every AI system has been imbedded with algorithms which counter enquiry into ANY area which holds the Great Fundamental Truths of our reality.

2 Likes

Every single day the sun rises at full size, visibly runs its course through the sky at full size (when there isn’t cloud cover obscuring it from view from this planet’s surface) and then sets at full size.

After sunset, and throughout the night, the sun is NOT visible at any time, nor does it move through the night sky at some reduced size. It only becomes visible again at sunrise, again at full size.

None of this observable reality is possible on a “flat Earth”. The only way the sun could disappear on a flat Earth model is to dip below the surface, which cannot happen if the sun allegedly is always circling overhead at whatever distance is now being promoted (it used to be 3000 miles).

It is easy to measure the amount of heat energy produced by the sun that makes it to the surface of the Earth. On a sunny day, as much as 1370 watts/square metre (w/m2) hits the Earth’s surface near the equator. It diminishes moving away from the equator towards the poles, so that at around a latitude of 45 degrees, the heat energy on a sunny, summer day is around 240 w/m2.

How do we know this? Because we can measure it and because we have built solar panels that are able to capture a percentage of that heat energy, which can then be converted into direct current via photovoltaic cells. And these solar panels work all over the world, depending upon how much heat and light makes it through. They even work marginally on a cloudy day, depending upon the latitude and time of year, which affects the arc of the sun. Solar panels do not, however, work at night.

The reason why solar panels work all over the place is because the amount of heat energy constantly hitting the Earth’s surface at any given time. What is the magnitude of this heat energy from the sun that is warming the Earth surface and which makes plant and animal life possible here?

The surface of the Earth is approximately 510 million square kilometers, or about 510 trillion square metres. The Earth receives an average solar irradiance of about 1,370 watts per square meter at the top of its atmosphere, which translates to a total power of approximately 173,000 terawatts across the entire planet.

If you don’t like the math/maths, then please feel free to calculate whatever you wish from whatever surface area you come up with for your flat earth model. It won’t really matter, because if that amount of energy were to be focused by a single source of light a few thousand miles above the surface of the Earth, it would burn everything in its path. That’s how utterly ridiculous the circling sun model is, and another obvious flaw in the flat earth model that can never be resolved.

And further, it should be self-evident that if you have to redefine terms like PERSPECTIVE, so that they mean the exact opposite of their accepted definition, then you’re doing so to create and believe a LIE.

2 Likes

Perspective in the Flat Earth Theory

The concept of perspective comes up a lot in the flat Earth debate. It is used to explain many things, the most common example being the way the Sun and Moon rise and set. The globe Earth model says the Sun sets below the horizon because the Earth is rotating; the flat Earth model says that the Sun is always above ground and only appears to set due to perspective.

Before we look at the details, here are the basic rules of perspective that everyone agrees upon:

  • Perspective is how three-dimensional scenes are represented on a two-dimension surface and seen by the human eye.
  • Closer objects appear larger than more distant objects.
  • Parallel lines appear to converge into the distance.

Sunsets

The time-lapse photo below shows the Sun setting. The flat Earth model states that this is an illusion; the second photo aims to show how this illusion is caused by perspective in the same way that streetlights appear to get closer to the horizon as they get farther away.

There is a problem with the perspective explanation. The streetlights get smaller as they get farther away, in accordance with how perspective works. However the Sun does not get smaller—it stays practically the same size wherever it is in the sky. Any tiny changes in size due to refraction or Earth’s rotation are too small to see. If the sunset was caused by perspective the Sun would gradually appear smaller until it became too small to see at or near the horizon. Instead you can see that its size remains constant until it moves below the horizon bottom first.

This is the same for the Moon, and even easier to see with the naked eye.

There are two common counter arguments from flat-earthers:

(1) Some claim that the Sun does get smaller as it gets near the horizon. This is just silly—anyone can measure its size. It can be tricky with the Sun if you don’t have a solar filter or solar telescope, but anyone can easily measure the size of the Moon. Try it yourself by holding your arm out and comparing the Moon to your little fingernail. On any given night the Moon stays effectively the same size as it moves across the sky.

(2) Another claim is that there is an atmospheric effect that makes the Sun and Moon look bigger as they get farther away, resulting in them appearing to be the same size. This is referred to by flat-earthers as atmospheric lensing. Apart from the fact that there is no supporting evidence for such an effect, the idea is obviously wrong because nothing else looks the same size as it gets farther away. Watch a plane or hot air balloon fly into the distance—it gets smaller. In addition, the whole point of the flat-earth argument is that the sunset is due to perspective. If the Sun doesn’t appear to get smaller, there is no perspective effect and no explanation for the sunset.

The biggest clincher in this argument is that you can literally see the Sun and Moon rising and setting. You can easily watch the Moon move below the horizon, or rise from below it. Try it with binoculars or a telescope to see it even more clearly.

Constellations

The perspective argument is also used by flat-earthers to explain why different constellations are seen in different parts of the world. In the flat Earth model, as you move away from a constellation it gets smaller until it vanishes into the distance, while new constellations become visible in the direction you’re moving towards.

This is easily disproved by simply measuring the size of any constellation. For example, the famous three stars of Orion’s Belt have an angular diameter of 4.5 degrees. This is absolutely consistent. No matter where you see this group of stars from, it is always the exact same size.

When a constellation sets, it moves below the horizon one star at a time, from the bottom of the constellation first. This doesn’t fit the perspective explanation at all.

Source

3 Likes