I guess they sure can refuse it? Because Iâve already seen article about a woman from GreenIand who genuinely wants them to take up arms against American occupation if the U.S. military invades.
Brave girl! While I have no particular love for the worldâs current internationalist system, this is honestly stupid. Denmark has done nothing to us. Our current military bases and our Arctic nuclear submarine force have been dependable as early warning systems in the Arctic for the last fifty years.
Risking NATOâs very existence over this is a farceâŚbut maybe thatâs Trumpâs real aim? He HATES NATO and wants the United States out of it.
The rare-earths thing does track a bit. I do know the Department of War is not happy about the current state of U.S. access to rare-earth minerals. That was a non-trivial factor in the Afghanistan War as well.
DISTURBING: Norway just told thousands of citizens: if war breaks out, weâre taking your home, your car, and everything you own.
This is not a drill. Itâs the clearest sign yet that Western governments arenât planning for peaceâtheyâre preparing for war, and will seize your property in order to do it.
13,500 Norwegians have already received letters warning their homes, vehicles, boats, and machinery may be confiscated under âpreparatory requisitions.â Officials say itâs for defense. But zoom out, and the truth looks much darker.
Arctic tensions are exploding. Trump is pushing to annex Greenland. And military archbishops are now saying itâs âmorally acceptableâ to disobey illegal war orders. Meanwhile, the media is grooming citizens to shame anyone who resists conscription.
1- At the moment the USA has no sizeable troop numbers in Greenland, so if the Russians decide to take Greenland, thereâll be hardly any American boots on the ground to deter themâŚPS- Trump said today that he definitely wonât be invading, so Greenlanders should at least now invite him to send US boots on the ground to secure their future.
2- NATO is a useless damp squib, remember not a single NATO country stepped up to help their NATO ally Britain win the Falklands War, and I bet Putin hasnât forgot that..
Norway shares a small bit of its border with Russia in the far north, so if Russia invades there itâs debatable whether Trump will send his military to defend Norway seeing as how the useless Norway-based Nobel committee done the dirty on him by snubbing him for the peace prize..
Iam not one who rolls with the âresource narrativeâ every time these kinds of things happen because 90% of the time, grabbing resources is just secondary to some overarching agenda. Arguing that annexing Greenland is primarily about rare-earths is akin to arguing that leveling Gaza was about the rich oil fields off itâs coast or that the Iraq war was about oil aswell.
My sense is that Greenland is just another Crimea waiting to be seized should Western Europe become embroiled in a war so it makes sense to position oneself to acquire it now rather than brazenly stealing it in the midst of a hot war with everyone too busy to defend it. Trump alluded to this in his speech, in the same breath that he mentioned the Oreshniks fired 2wks ago because no one knows what Europe is going to look like post WW3.
What I liked about this Greenland stunt was that it was the ultimate âBoy Who Cried Wolfâ story. For years, European politicians have been saying; âThe Russian are coming!â ,âThe Russians are coming!â, Russia this-Russia that. Well the wolf has come, for real this time, albeit a different wolf. It also seemed to me that the stunt was meant to arrest their madness of rushing into war with Russia. Sandwiched between 2 powers, were they really going to put up a fight on both the Eastern & Western fronts?
Ironically, and Iâve watched a lot of interviews on this, everyone from diplomats to journalists has been adamant that there is no Russian threat and that Trump is making it all up (which is true, even the Chinese weighed in). Insisting that there is no threat while simultaneously prepping their populations for a war with Russia. Danish experts were consistent that America can do whatever it wants on the island and that certain aspects of the agreement can be (re-)negotiated but that the desire for annexation was about âsomething elseâ that they couldnât. Only the former Swedish PM, Carl Bildt, mentioned that âsomething elseâ and only in passingâŚ..that the frustration with European stonewalling on Ukraine was causing Trump to pin Denmark to the wall.
As a theater of world wars, it will be interesting to see what motivates Trump to get behind the Europeans in a fight with the Russians because in the Q&A with Mark Rutte (NATOâs sec-gen), a reporter asked him to clarify what he meant by this in his Davos speech
Trump responded; âYouâre a smart guy, you can figure it outâ
Prepare yourself for one of the most cynical things Iâve ever said:
Thereâs a huge utility in simply having buffer zones between blocs of empire.
I think pushing NATO right up to Putinâs doorstep is one of the biggest strategic mistakes the U.S. has ever made.
Nobody outside of the West calls Euromaidan, etc. âThe Revolution Of Dignityâ.
They call it âthe NATO coup of 2014â.
Iâve seen it.
I grew up in the 80âs and 90âs. Perestroika! Glasnost! The Berlin Wall fell! Seemed like the world might actually get it right for once!
But our faithful state-lapdog media sector generally speaking failed to tell us that Russia briefly cancelling socialism in the 90âs actually resulted in the Russian economy contracting by 75% - SEVENTY-FIVE PERCENT, we bricks in the States over 5% stock market crashes, can you imagine??? - so Gorbachev, the big hero over here, is actually reviled by the Russians, and Yeltsin too - and thatâs what brought Putin to power, who has quietly reinstituted a lot of the old Soviet stuff the Russians loved, like free college, even as he has cancelled every election that might have opposed his personal power, and guardedly remilitarized Russia against what he sees as NATO aggression.
I still thought the world order in the 90âs made a lot more sense than whatâs going on today.
There was peace. There was diplomacy. Diplomacy was even cool.
Thatâs why I feel we would be far better off with NATO as a buffer - much as I usually despise that kind of Pax Americana great-game-of-empire cynicism! - than we are blustering all over the world, threatening to annex Greenland, renaming Defense to âThe Department Of Warâ again to please a bunch of idiot grognards who want to take us back to 1781, and generally poking and prodding and provoking every bear in the world just to see if theyâll tithe us some of their honey.
Yes NATO is better than nothing if only for its deterrent value against Russia, but suppose Putin sees it as a bluff and invades a NATO country such as muslimTurkey, itâs debatable whether NATO troops (including Americans) would be willing to go and die there, or would they do as Riddick did and say-
Sure. Not our flag, not our war. I believe in that too.
But I also believe in the NATO system I saw in the 90âs - back when it WAS far from Russiaâs doorstep, and indeed did seem mostly defensive, and peace and peace processes were cooler than war.
9/11 changed a lot, and not for the better. All we have had since then is a world on edge.
That is the way the true architects of that attack continue to prefer it for us.
To get cynical once again:
There is a huge overlap between US military personnel and those of NATO.
So hey, if NATO as our buffer zone does fall apart, I shouldnât be too upset, right?
Unless we have made a bunch of enemies for ourselves in the interim by acting like idiots and invading a bunch of countries on false pretenses and surely that would never happen, oops, right?
I am sorry, but in an era where our government is not fully under our own control Iâm very dubious on everything.
Right now it feels like weâre being used to settle lsraeIâs old grudges - against Venezuela, against lran, and against a great deal of the MiddIe East generally that is coming to hate us, and these chickens we are raising and letting run wild are not going to be benign when they come home inevitably to roost.
I am certainly tired of seeing my nation used as an incubator for the violence of the lsraeIi settler movement. That might sound harsh or âanti-Semiticâ to some. But I am Jewish on my fatherâs side; I know the mindset of some of these settlers. They are nothing less than insane, violent fundamentalists who believe in the willful use of terror against the rest of the world to seize the entire planet for Zionism. Things are not benign, and I will not continue to willingly see my tax dollars used to fund people who firebomb elderly men and women and have been alleged to have cooked at least one dead PaIestinian infant on a grill.
Looking at this from a spiritual point of view, the Israelite nations of this world are gradually being separated from the rest of the world to set up this final phase of the final world war, pitting the Israelite nations â led by the U.S. and U.K. (the Two Witnesses / two Sons of Joseph / Two Candlesticks) â against the rest of the world.
So what Trump is doing right now, with Venezuela, Greenland and the rest of his colonial aspirations, should make perfect sense in that regard. Itâs not just about keeping those assets out of the hands of the Russians and Chinese (leading the kings of the East); itâs a last ditch effort to save the dying American empire thatâs polarizing the world.
And itâs unquestionably leading up to a war that the U.S. and U.K., along with the rest of the Israelite countries, cannot win.
America has been propping up Israel for donkeys years with cash and super-duper weaponry and I sure as hell donât know why..:)..What has Israel ever done for America?..And by allying itself with Israel, America is making itself a terror target as âIsraelâs friend-âWeâwith Allahâs helpâcall on every Muslim who believes in God and wishes to be rewarded to comply with Allahâs order to kill the Americans and plunder their money wherever and whenever they find it. We also call on Muslim ulema, leaders, youths, and soldiers to launch the raid on Satanâs U.S. troops and the devilâs supporters allying with them, and to displace those who are behind them so that they may learn a lesson.â -Feb. 1998 - Bin Laden edict
Zionism has always been a project of the MĐ°sonic deep state.
The RĐžthschilds rule lsraeI no matter who sits in the Prime Ministerâs chair - the main street in TeI AvŃv is called âRĐžthschild Avenueâ for a reason - and they became billionaires in the first place banking for the VĐ°ticĐ°n. These people donât give a damn about Moses and consider Christ âan ignorant man defying Roman authorityâ - that was a direct quote I heard from a high-ranking MĐ°son on social media a decade ago. Their God is Lucifer, and they make this quite clear behind the scenes. (Pictured: The late Baroness PhiIIippine de RĐžthschild.)
The better truthers I know simply regard the VĐ°ticĐ°n as the living facade of what remains of the Roman Empire.
It is all allegedly run by the FrĐ°ternitas SĐ°turni - the Brotherhood of SĐ°turn, and the true source of the ideologies underpinning our modern âSatanâ myths. This is reported to be the real ranking leadership of the MĐ°sons and lIIuminati. (Pictured: Jim Carrey in Saturn T-shirt at his birthday party among other leading MĐ°sonic comedians in Hollywood, including Adam SandIer and Jimmy KimmeI.)
For those who may be interested in the âspecial relationshipâ between the âJewsâ and the Romans, which began 2600 years ago in Babylon, spawned Talmudic Judaism, created Rome, murdered Jesus, produced the Jesuits and has brought the murderous, war-profiteering counterfeit-Jews to the brink of their satanic goal of total global domination through wars and vaccines, please read the Babylon Revealed series.
bricks in the States over 5% stock market crashes, can you imagine??? - so Gorbachev, the big hero over here, is actually reviled by the Russians, and Yeltsin too - and thatâs what brought Putin to power, who has quietly reinstituted a lot of the old Soviet stuff the Russians loved, like free college, even as he has cancelled every election that might have opposed his personal power, and guardedly remilitarized Russia against what he sees as NATO aggression.
