Venus - Innana, Ishtar, Isis, Lucifer, Lilith

[Chaldean]

Supplement to the trinity, in the posts above.

The Trinity is revered in all mystery religions. The “universal Church” consists of two great “churches” in apparent contradiction:
The Roman Catholic Church is called the “Church of Peter” and represents an exoteric church intended for the masses.

The Masonic Church is otherwise called the “John’s Church” and represents an esoteric church, reserved for “initiates”.

The formal doctrine of the Trinity was the result of several insufficient attempts to clarify who and what the Christian God really is… To deal with these problems, the Church Fathers met in [AD] 325 at the Council of Nicaea to establish an orthodox biblical definition regarding divine identity." However, it was not until 381 that “the divinity of the Spirit was confirmed at the Council of Constantinople.”

Although Tertullian introduced the term “trinity”, what he taught and believed was different from what the doctrine of the trinity is today. And since he introduced this term, it means that the doctrine of the Trinity as taught today did not exist in Tertullian’s time. And if it did not exist in his day, it could never have existed in the time of Christ and the apostles.

Tertullian, however, introduced pagan ideas into worship. He taught about sacrifices for the dead and made the sign of the cross on the foreheads of the faithful. He also immersed people three times to baptize them. Tertullian openly admitted that he adopted these ideas from pagan teachings and could not support them with Scripture, but he believed that if Christians adopted some of the pagan rituals of the pagans, it would be easier for them to join Christianity.

According to Wikipedia, Tertullian’s views on the Deity are as follows:

Tertullian was only the forerunner of the Nicene doctrine and did not state an immanent trinity. His use of trinitas (Latin for “Trinity”) emphasized the multiple nature of God. In his treatise against Praxeas he used the words: “Trinity and economy, persons and substance”. The Son is separate from the Father, and the Spirit from the Father and the Son. “These three are one substance, not one person; and it was said, ‘I and my Father are one,’ not because of the singularity of number, but the unity of substance.” In his book Tertullian against Praxseas also states that the Son was not co-eternal with the Father and had a beginning as the begotten Son of God. He also did not teach that the Holy Spirit was a literal being. Thus, the doctrine of the trinity as we know it today does not even come from the man who introduced the word Trinity .

[Chaldean]

THE MYSTERY OF THE HOLY TRINITY is the highest Babylonian SECRET.
THE MYSTERY OF THE HOLY TRINITY is the highest CABALISTIC SECRET.
THE MYSTERY OF THE HOLY TRINITY is the highest SECRET OF HEMETISM.
THE MYSTERY OF THE HOLY TRINITY is the highest TEMPLAR MYSTERY.
THE MYSTERY OF THE HOLY TRINITY is the highest ROMAN CATHOLIC SECRET.
THE MYSTERY OF THE HOLY TRINITY is the highest SECRET OF MAGIC.
THE MYSTERY OF THE HOLY TRINITY is the highest MASONIC MYSTERY.

Sun worship is one of the oldest forms of religion and laid the foundations of Trinitarian worship and symbolism.

"THE NUMBER THREE WAS CONSIDERED AS THE NUMBER OF THE SUPREME DEITY.
ONE OF THE MOST PRIMITIVE FORM OF RELIGION IS THE SUN CULT.
THE PRIMITIVO MAN WORSHIPED THE SUN AS A TRINITY, ONE GOD IN THREE DIFFERENT FORMS:
THE SUN RISING, THE SUN HIGH IN THE SOUTHERN SKY AND THE SUN SET.
THE EGYPTIANS WORSHIPED THE SUN AS “THREE IN ONE”

• (Egyptian Gods, New International Encyclopedia. New York: Dodd, 1917. Volume 7, 529) -

[TheSeeker7]

Navigating The Lies

[Chaldean]

The culture of Babylon is still alive. These are the modern (POP culture) “Queens of Heaven”

[Chaldean]

ONE OF THE HIGHEST examples of how Babylonian paganism has survived to this day is how the Roman church invented the cult of Mary to replace the ancient cult of the mother goddess.

The Chinese had a mother goddess called Shingmoo, or “Holy Mother”. She was depicted with a child in her arms and rays of glory around her head.

Catholic idolatry is a copy of paganism.

The ancient Germans worshiped the virgin Herta with her son in her arms. The Scandinavians called her Disa, who was also depicted with her son. The Etruscans called her Nutria, and among the druids Virgo-Patitura was revered as “Mother of God”. In India she was known as Indrani, who was also depicted with her son in her arms.

The mother goddess was known to the Greeks as Aphrodite or Ceres, to the Sumerians as Nanna, and to her followers in ancient Rome as Venus or Fortuna, and her son as Jupiter. For many centuries, Isis, the “Great Goddess”, and her son Iswara were worshiped in India, where temples were built in their honor.

In Asia the mother was known as Cybele and the son as Deoius. “But whatever her name or place,” writes one writer, “she was the wife of Baal, the virgin queen of heaven, who conceived without a man in her womb.”

When the children of Israel fell into apostasy, they too were deceived by this mother goddess cult. As we read in Judges 2:13, “They forsook the Lord and served Baal and Ashtoreth.” Astarte or Astarte was the name by which the goddess was known to the children of Israel. It is sad to think that those who knew the true God would abandon Him and worship their pagan mother. Yet this is exactly what they did over and over again (Judges 10:6; 1 Samuel 7:3-4; 12:10; 1 Kings 11:5; 2 Kings 23:13). One of the titles by which the goddess was known among them was “queen of heaven” (Jeremiah 44:17-19). The prophet Jeremiah rebuked them for their worship, but they rebelled against his warning.

[TheSeeker7]

Britannia

Ishtar

[Chaldean]

And with every false vision, every angel of light, every UFO encounter, Catholics, namely their leaders who have historically preferred to keep their flock ignorant of the Word of God, allow this great and growing deception to continue.

Franciscan historian Bernardino de Sahagún stated:

In this place [Tepeyac], [the Indians] had a temple dedicated to the mother of the gods, which they called Tonantzin, which means Our Mother. There they made many sacrifices in honor of this goddess… And now, when the church of Our Lady of Guadalupe was built there, they also call her Tonantzin, motivated by the preachers who called Our Lady, Our Lady, Tonantzin. It is not known for certain where this Tonantzin originated, but we do know that from its first use the word means ancient Tonantzin. And this is something that needs to be corrected, because the correct [native] name of Our Lady, Holy Mary, is not Tonantzin, but Dios inantzin. This appears to be a satanic invention to disguise idolatry under the confusion of this name, Tonantzin.

Thus the cult of the Queen of Heaven became the basis of the “reasonable” Western world.

The Queen of Heaven, this Mother Goddess, has indeed taken on a new “incarnation”: the Virgin Mary, whom approximately 1.3 billion Catholics around the world honor and adore. Archaeologists have even found images that could be considered images of the Virgin and Holy Child buried in the ancient world, long before the stories of Mary and the Baby Jesus were told.

[TheSeeker7]

@Chaldean

The Queen of Heaven, this Mother Goddess, has indeed taken on a new “incarnation”: the Virgin Mary, whom approximately 1.3 billion Catholics around the world honor and adore. Archaeologists have even found images that could be considered images of the Virgin and Holy Child buried in the ancient world, long before the stories of Mary and the Baby Jesus were told.

[Kiel_Kyght]

Absolute nonsense you post. The councils did not create the Trinity. These Biblical concepts were well in place long before, going all the way back to the Old Testament. Nice copying-and-pasting of Zeitgeist-film propaganda skills.

[Chaldean]

@Kiel_Kyght

Absolute nonsense you post. The councils did not create the Trinity. These Biblical concepts were well in place long before, going all the way back to the Old Testament. Nice copying-and-pasting of Zeitgeist-film propaganda skills.

I don’t know, maybe you misunderstood.

I did not write that the Council of Nicaea created the trinity (that he invented it).
At the Council of Nicaea, the orthodox biblical definition regarding divine identity was established and a dogma was created.

This Dogma of the Holy Trinity was imposed on everyone by force and as state law by Emperor Theodosius.

Those who did not believe in this dogma were therefore called “heretics”, “lunatics”, “lunatics” and “lunatics”.

Christians who profess faith in Jesus Christ but do not say they believe in the Holy Trinity are in fact isolated, stigmatized, labeled as “non-Christians”,
“fraudulent workers,” cunning fraudsters, “antitrinitarians,” or people “without revelations of the Holy Spirit.”

At the councils, they had to establish one reasonably reasonable definition of the trinity because the issue was not coherent or logical.

The creed of the First Council of Nicaea, the Nicene Creed, said little about the Holy Spirit. (Trinity - Wikipedia) At the First Council of Nicaea (325), all attention was focused on the relationship between the Father and the Son.

The dogma of the Holy Trinity prevents many people from understanding who Jesus Christ is and prevents them from RECOGNIZING HIM.

The Satanic Trinitarian dogma is an incredible blasphemy that contains a clear and a very clear denial of the existence of One Lord God.

“The Lord is our God, the Lord is one”
-Deuteronomy 6:4-9 -

"To formulate the dogma of the Holy Trinity, the Church had to create its own terminology
with the help of concepts of philosophical origin"
-“Imprimatur Potest - Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger 1995, p. 74” -

-COUNCIL OF CONSTANTINOPLE -

In the ancient cult, many, many Trinitys were placed under the protection of many;
when Constantine and his successors imposed the new religion on the Roman Empire many pagan traditions filtered into Christianity and thousands of people joined it “new megareligion” of the state.

In 381 AD Council of Constantinople This doctrine was additionally modified to also take into account the so-called “third person of the Holy Spirit”.
The Babylonian dogma was therefore proposed entirely anew:
“THREE DIFFERENT PERSONS IN ONE GOD”

I am not the alpha and omega and I can probably be wrong in many matters, and if someone presents me with a constructive, logical antithesis, I can change my mind.

Writing that an issue is nonsense because I don’t agree with it is not constructive.

Since you wrote:

@Kiel_Kyght

These Biblical concepts were well in place long before, going all the way back to the Old Testament.

Maybe you could give some examples and expand your thoughts.

Well, I guess we are on this Forum to exchange our observations and opinions, but let them be constructive opinions.
Nobody has Patent for Truth.

[Kiel_Kyght]

God has the patent for truth. Your copy-and-paste propaganda…that dog don’t hunt.

[paulo]

Im with you, Kiel

[crumplednotes]

If you aren’t trinitarian then what are you? You do believe in Christ’s divinity don’t you? The 5th chapter of acts makes it pretty clear that the holy spirit is also God.

[Chaldean]

@crumplednotes as my friend would say @Kiel_Kyght

@Kiel_Kyght

Your copy-and-paste propaganda…that dog don’t hunt.

[TheSeeker7]

@crumplednotes

If you aren’t trinitarian then what are you? You do believe in Christ’s divinity don’t you? The 5th chapter of acts makes it pretty clear that the holy spirit is also God.

I don’t believe the Bible out of hand after Romes meddling and King James “canonization”

[Chaldean]

@TheSeeker7

I don’t believe the Bible out of hand after Romes meddling and King James “canonization”

“Lest seeing they may not see and hearing they may not understand”

It should be borne in mind that the original form of the Bible was completely different from the one we know today. The books that are now in it were chosen by people.

So how can we explain the origin of biblical content, or rather their selection? It turns out that this choice was not made at once and was not supported by a single person or group. On the contrary: it was a long-term process with numerous changes. The content of the Bible has evolved, so over the centuries its books have been removed or added to eventually create the set we know today.

DATES OF CREATION
some Roman Catholic beliefs and practices

Prayers for the dead were introduced in AD 300.
Signing the sign of the cross 300 AD
Service in Latin 600 AD
Devotion to Mary and the Saints 788 AD
Veneration of crosses, images and relics 788 AD
Baptism of bells 965 AD
Fasting on Fridays and before Easter 998 AD
Making holy water 1000 AD
Prohibition of marriage for priests 1079 AD
The rosary was invented in 1090 AD.
Mass made a sacrifice 1100 AD
Sale of indulgences 1190 AD
The transubstantiation of the wafer (transsub-stantiatio) 1215 AD
Earful confession to a priest 1215 AD.
Worshiping the wafer (adoration) 1220 AD
Forbidding the people to take the cup in Holy Communion. 1414 AD
Purgatory invented 1438 AD.
Addition of the Apocrypha to the Bible in 1546 AD.
Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary adopted in 1864 AD.
Papal infallibility introduced in 1870 AD.

Despite everything, the Roman Catholic Church still wants to appear unchanged.

[Kiel_Kyght]

Oh please. The Canon was well established centuries before the Roman Catholic Church. Quit snorting that Zeitgeist crack.

[jojodancer]

I think you are downplaying how powerful and influential the Roman Catholic Church was. Most a lot has of major modern holidays were pagan holidays that the Catholics co-opted to increase congregations. The basic structure of most modern day Christian Churches were either influenced by the Catholics or breakaways from the Catholic religion.

[TheSeeker7]

[phenleighly]

You know what? What if the symbols aren’t the problem but rather the interpretation of them is? We are talking about repeating patterns that occur constantly in nature but the elite have hijacked what are normally innocent patterns for their own agendas? The Marian symbology for example, while I don’t fully agree entirely with Rome but Mary is the mirror opposite of Eve/Lilith. The fallen women uphold the moon, Mary stands on it. Jesus is the second Adam, born from flesh, not created, yet is cleansed from original sin. While Adam begat sin through the flesh, Jesus offers redemption through spiritual communion. The goat of mendes isn’t just any goat, it’s a representation of a woman’s womb. Most of the ancient cults were fertility cults. They simply happened to be mistaken by believing they could achieve divinity via sex, or by orgasm. That is what God means by the ways of flesh. The fleeting sensation of climax is just that, fleeting and temporal. It can’t compare with real spiritual peace and contentment. Which is how the devil got actual control of mankind.