That piece was written by the current head of JINSA.
I’ve just been lazy to bring back this thread but after watching a recent CBN News episode with the focus on efforts to get Christians to support the rebuilding of the Temple, I think it’s time.
Very often, you hear people say that they don’t care what happens 5000miles away in Netanyahu’s sandbox but a World Gov’t HQ’d in Israel is everyone’s problem that can’t just be ignored because you don’t live in the Middle East. More so when a rebuilt temple is going to be the center of it all. To be precise,a Messianic dictatorship is going to render constitutions irrelevant. If you can be thrown into jail now for criticizing Israel’s actions, what do you think will happen when the Sanhedrin is running the show? Will you be able to criticize “God’s vicegerents” absent capital punishment? Curiously, the people super-excited about a rebuilt temple never really explain these details to the rest of us.
Evidence in public sources is scant. Regardless, this agenda has been the overarching goal driving major historical events in the last 200yrs. Everything from the 2 world wars, 1948, 9/11, the Arab Spring, etc. Tom Barrack (US special envoy to Syria) recently remarked that it’s incredible the region hasn’t known peace in over 100yrs and when asked the ever-present question; “what’s the end-game?” he said that he didn’t know.
This is a big deal to a disparate group of people and it is a (literal) hill to die on. The 1000 (soon to be 10k) christian pastors and influencers are, in effect, being prepared to fight for this agenda to the death. The occultists have to fulfil their end of the bargain with their patron saint Lucifer….to inaugurate his reign in Jerusalem. Then the religious Zionists who also think their messiah is returning to reign out of the ancient city.
I know it feels like long ago and seems forgotten but Hamas, in marking 100 days of the war, said in a statement that one of the reasons they attacked was to stall the red heifer/temple project. Iam not a Muslim but iam now appreciative of the fact that the Al Aqsa Mosque compound and the presence of Palestinians in the Occupied territories stand/have stood between the world and a Messianic dictatorship, as Yuval Harari calls it.
Now, I do I believe that we will live to see all this? No, I do not. And for many reasons…for one, time is literally running out. But if iam dead-wrong and we wake up tomorrow and it is 2050 and the temple is up, with services running smoothly…then I guess it’s a problem we’ll all have to deal with somehow. I thought it was well put by RT:
Why Syriana? Because when Stephen Gaghan, the director, was doing research for the film, he found it to be a real term used in the think tanks….nevermind that said thinktanks bill themselves as non-partisan.
The movie’s website states that “‘Syriana’ is a real term used by Washington think-tanks to describe a hypothetical reshaping of the Middle East.”[17] Gaghan said he saw Syriana as “a great word that could stand for man’s perpetual hope of remaking any geographic region to suit his own needs.”[18] The word Syriana derives from Syria + the Latin suffix -ana; it means, roughly, “in the manner of Syria.” Historically, Syria refers not to the state that since 1944 has borne the name, but to a more extensive land stretching from the eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea to the middle Euphrates River and the western edge of the desert steppe, and from the Tauric system of mountains in the north to the edge of the Sinai desert in the south. This land was part of the Fertile Crescent, and has historically been a geopolitically crucial junction for trade routes from the east, from Asia Minor and the Aegean, and from Egypt, and has long been a focus of great power conflicts. -Wikipedia





























