‘Rogue state behaviour’: Israel carrying out covert influence operations in Canada, report says
There’s a link to the report (PDF) inside the article
The amazing irony is there will be a 100% peaceful “greater Israel” project after Judgment Day (Rev. 7:4-9) that won’t resemble any of the plans these counterfeit Jews have, nor will it include any of them, unless they genuinely repent of their extremely evil ways.
Everyone is talking about this now but this stuff can usually be found on JINSA’s website as papers…long before they become bills or a section in a bill. They often crow about their “success” after a bill gets passed that contains something they crafted. This was up on their site a year ago.
Ofcourse, funds were to be allocated to “anti-tunnel” co-operation
Israel wants to dominate the region, so naturally these proposals raise questions…
^^Oops!
Aipac also reported lobbying on the US-Israel Futures Act on Capitol Hill as well as at the Department of Defense in the first quarter of the year. While neither the House nor Senate legislation made it out of committee, the same legislative architecture and much of the same language appeared in section 224 of the NDAA, buried deep within the 505-page draft legislation.
In short, Aipac and the FDD were successful in moving their unpopular legislative agendas forward, even as both the House and Senate bills remain stalled in committees.
Make no mistake, the intent and the consequences of this legislation, dubbed the United States–Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative, go far, far beyond the sharing of military technology that traditionally has attracted so much support among Senators and Congress members.
For the Israel-first theorists whose thinking and position papers guided its formulation, it is the proverbial camel’s nose. By making the United States increasingly dependent on Israeli technology – in AI, quantum computing, high-powered lasers, cyberwarfare, anti-drone systems, and other advanced fields – while also transferring America’s most sophisticated technologies to Israeli governments, Israel and its advocates are quietly steering the relationship away from patronage or even partnership and toward something more asymmetrical: a structure designed to harness American power for the aims of “Zionism 2.0”.
That was the vision advanced by David Wurmser, the main author of the Clean Break document – a 1996 policy paper submitted to Benjamin Netanyahu, which advocated ending the Oslo peace process, casting the US and Israel as engaged in a struggle to defend western civilization, empowering Israel to reshape the political landscape of the Middle East, and overthrowing regimes in the region, beginning with Iraq. Its signatories included Richard Perle and Douglas Feith. All three were highly placed within the George W Bush administration as architects of the American invasion of Iraq.
Wurmser introduced this new “Zionism 2.0” framework in a report published the same month the US-Israel Futures Act was introduced. Titled Israel 2048: A Blueprint for a Rising Asymmetric Geopolitical Power, the report advocates an Israeli security strategy based on “preventative wars”. US authorization for these wars is to be achieved by forging such an intimate relationship between the Israeli and US militaries that Israel would become “indispensable” to the United States, both in the Middle East and in its global struggle to defend “western civilization” against Russia, China and an increasingly Islamized Europe.
Their vision is of “New Jerusalem” (the US) wedded to “Old Jerusalem” (Israel) on the basis of both having been divinely chosen for the mission of saving civilization from the “red-green” (Marxist-Muslim) alliance.
For Israel, this means not just ruling all the territory between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, but dominating the Middle East, launching wars of “prevention” against all potential adversaries (including Turkey, Iran and even Egypt) and, with Britain and France succumbing to the influence of foreign immigrants and the disease of “European secularism”, serving as the US’s most important ally in its global struggle to preserve “civilization” – labeled either “Jewish-Christian” or “western”.
The extravagance of such ideas clearly marks the origins of the project, exposing the influence of well-funded dark-money groups and thinktanks exerting their influence on behalf of Israel’s government.
Now is the time to say what section 224 of the National Defense Authorization Act really is: not an alliance with a talented and responsible ally that will help keep the US safe, but a trap being set by Israel and its lobby to bind our country to a state that, for all its past promise, has gone rogue.
ETA
We’ve been groomed/programmed to allow for isreals control
tptb began this agenda long ago
2mins
JINSA: How the Jewish Institute for National Security of America Shapes U.S.–Israel Policy
