The reality of our Flat, Non Rotating Realm - The Greatest Lie

My stance on the shape of the earth has nothing to do with NASA or any other organisation. There are dozens of videos and photos of boats disappearing behind the horizon to name something. I will become a flat earther if you can provide me a telescope and show me Mount Everest through the telescope from the top of the Eiffel Tower, for example.

You can also clearly see the moon is full of craters if you buy a telescope. The moon has phases becasue it doesn’t give it’s own light. That’s also perfectly aligned with theology. The moon stands for the passive feminine principle.

Keep on thinking I’m gullible. But I was very interested in the Flat Earth theory when I found out about it. For years I have weighed all the evidence (without taking NASA into account, or the space station or any of that), I’m very open minded, and still am, but the evidence for a flat earth isn’t convincing to me.

I think NASA is there to raise the believe in extraterrestrial life, which I believe is the spiritual realm of demons. Maybe one day there will be a fake alien invasion or something like that. Than the Antichrist will battle them and almost all of humanity will fall for the Antichrist.

Of course there is something about Greenland. Maybe it’s for reseources, maybe someting other. I am not afraid of my beliefs being trampled. You’re mistaken about that.

3 Likes

You seem to utter the same points over and over again. I’m not part of the sleeping masses. I have made the point earlier in this thread. Flat earthers always claim that in the ancient world it was common belief the earth was flat. And in the ancient world there was as much violence and ungodliness as nowadays. You think the only reason why people don’t believe in God is because they say the earth is a globe. I don’t see why that is the case. It’s a belief in itself to think that. I think God is so powerful He can make a spinning ball with water on top of it and I think the infinite universe resembles Gods infinite nature. Your God is only capable of making a dome. What is the dome even made of?

1 Like

Why would THEY use a flat earth map on their logo? Some say it is because the earth is flat. I suspect otherwise.




3International Maritime Organization


3 Likes

Like literally, the best post, eveR

2 Likes

Geeeez junior - where did you get the idea that I somehow think ‘holography’ had ANYTHING to do with the 9/11 ritual - please explain exactly where I made that claim ….dont bother junior - I have never made any statement of such. What’s with the ‘U93 and the Pentagon CRASHES’ - have you (expertly) discovered multiple crashes at the pentagram - pleeeeze expand because we saw NOTHING except smoking shrubs with the bullshit story of U93 …NOTHING - no bits whatsoever - have you ever attended a plane crash junior - I dont think you have a clue. I have attended a significant aircraft crash not long after impact and I can tell you THERE ARE COUNTLESS THOUSANDS OF BITS EVERY FUCKING WHERE. Oh, and the ‘death certificates’ …are you going to try and tell us that you PERSONALLY checked EVERY death that (supposedly) occurred - that you have forensically followed each to a conclusion and matched all the details ….I’ll answer it for you junior ….NO you fucking HAVENT. The more you spew out on this forum, the more you look to be an empty vessel .

Here’s freeman again posting childish gibberish - what did you think you would get from ‘wikihow’ - try and understand this fundamental ….you cant prove the earth is a ball ….because….wait for it …..IT ISNT.
Dont waste valuable space posting juvenile rubbish - it makes you look sad and somewhat lame.

Here ya go again freeman hahaha - Its PERSPECTIVE stupid.

Pleeeeeeeze get rid of that nasa T shirt and all those genuine pics of the International FAKE Station hahahah.

Absolutely not. 2,997 people died at the Towers alone - or so we are told.

What I have done is test a sampling from both of the Towers and from each supposed hijacked flight.

The SSDI is highly imperfect. But most of the death certificates from the World Trade Center and those two flights are there. Those from the other two supposed flights are largely missing.

I can accept that the “Pentagram”, as you put it, was possibly really hit by a cruise missile. Certainly United 93 didn’t crash either, and some other form of missile, drone, or dummy crashed in that field.

The other two flights are more problematic, and I’ve seen heartbreaking alleged statements from victims’ families on those flights - though it’s certain the alleged hijackers were NOT on those flights and never were.

Now hey! We all know they also use an endless parade of false flags and crisis actors. So why don’t we focus on getting a new investigation rather than fighting about trying to be right about one before it happens? I don’t think quibbling about any of this is as important as simply waking the public up to the fact that there was a coverup in the first place. About 90% of the USA still has no idea.

1 Like

About @Kidkip, you wrote the following:

If you haven’t noticed, he/she/it doesn’t have any points to make, nor has provided a single shred of so-called evidence that the world is allegedly flat, which simply isn’t the case.

This thread is simply a platform for them to call anyone and everyone that isn’t in the FE religion stupid or gullible or a “NASA fan boy” or whatever their fragile ego needs to keep itself inflated.

There doesn’t seem to be much point in responding to someone who has lost their mind to the extent that are no longer capable of putting together a coherent thought, much less offer a rational explanation.

Incessant name calling, strawman arguments and an endless stream of non-sequitur logical fallacies are tell-tale signs of someone attempting to push a viewpoint that is so weak and indefensible it can’t withstand even minimal scrutiny.

Anyone who has ever actually observed the sun rise, arc across the sky and set at full size should know the sun isn’t circling overhead.

And for the extremely hard-headed, binoculars or a telescope, particularly looking out over the sea, should end any debate about the curvature of the Earth, as you’ve pointed out. It’s all right there for anyone who has eyes to see.

The ego doesn’t want these answers, because the truth would deprive it of the one thing it desperately needs: its imaginary throne and position as gatekeeper of the mind.

Isaiah 30:8-10
30:8 Now go, write it before them in a table, and note it in a Book, that it may be for the time to come for ever and ever:
30:9 That this [is] a rebellious people, lying children, children [that] will not hear The Law of the “I AM”:
30:10 Which say to the Seers, See not; and to the Prophets, Prophesy not unto us right things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits (lies):

Lies are always eventually exposed.

The Truth always stands the test of time.

3 Likes

Thank you. Couldn’t have said it better, also because English isn’t my native language.

2 Likes

I have never used any NASA rhetoric. and I never posted a Space Station picture. You are hallucinating.

4 Likes

It’s very entertaining to see you call the posts of Afreeman childish gibberish. Thanks for this comedic contribution.

3 Likes

A rainbow should be enough, logically, to convince that Planet Earth is indeed round, circular, and a globe unto itself.

Earth is made up of sand and soil, among other particles of matter, which are themselves granular and roundly shaped so that one can roll it between the thumb and index fingers of one’s good hand.

A rainbow itself is pretty much half a circle and if it happens to occur in one’s line of sight then it can happen to occur in somebody else’s viewpoint say, at a thousand kilometers behind me for instance, whilst s/he is facing in a direction opposite to the one I’m facing. Illustration:

( o o )

_/ L

See two persons up there? One facing the west and the other facing the east?

Add to them two more individuals facing the north and the south and looking at the same semi-circular rainbows all at the same time in their respective directions.

Guess that should prove that this ball that we are living on can be said to be made up of four circular rainbows glued together right? As in:

.The truth is simple to understand folkS.

3 Likes

Interestingly enough, a true rainbows Natural shape is a Circle, not a arch. I’ve only Seen one once from an airplane, and it was quite Beautiful.

4 Likes

The U.N.’s map is called an Arctic azimuthal equidistant projection. Nothing is a globe except an actual globe, but the Arctic azimuthal equidistant projection has a number of useful features that make it scientifically useful as a 2d representation of one - particularly, correct azimuth (direction from the chosen pole) and proportionally correct equidistance.

Now hey! If you are a flat-earther and believe Antarctica is not truly a continent but an ice wall preventing human access to the magical realms beyond it, the Arctic azimuthal equidistant projection is also great - because then Earth on the map sure does look like a big old flat circle with an ice wall around it.

Once again, the easy way for flerfers to back up their position on that is simply to get some photo evidence: of the Antarctic ice wall, of the supposed flat Earth from space, or from the Southern Ocean proving that it is larger than currently predicted.

This doesn’t seem to happen, and in an era of drones and weather balloons that are available to the general public, that’s really going to hurt you all. :thinking:

3 Likes

I nearly choked on my coffee - is it possible that people can be THIS stupid - THIS blind to the signs and symbols that are in their faces 24/7 ….well, look no further than the genius ‘fotw’ ….if you look up the definition of ‘thick as two short planks’, you will find a picture of this sorry waste of fresh air. So all these ‘pyramid’ organisations use the FLAT EARTH MAP ….and you think they do it because …….?? Please enlighten - we breathlessly await your theory. You might explain why the FLAT EARTH MAP that is the logo used by all these organisations just happens to be divided into 33 sections - maybe you could come up with something given a week or two. Geeeeeez ….some people actually are THAT dumb.

Amazing - ‘heartbreaking alleged statements from victim’s families on those flights’ ….and then we get ‘We know they also use an endless parade of false flags and crisis actors’ ……fucking unbelievable …look junior, if you put any more bullets into your own feet you wont be walking very well. How oxymoronic can you get junior - here’s a cracker - ‘2997 people died at the Towers alone - or so we are told’ …get out of here ….did your research prove they died or not …hahahaha ….here’s a suggestion junior - swap out the ammo for blanks - it’ll be easier on your feet.

More freeman waffle - why waste your time typing out all that utter rubbish. Your last two lines are words you should be extremely cognisant of … you defending the indefensible …and I actually think you know it (whatever you are - cant be AI - AI wouldn’t write that shit). There is another line you could have used freeman (hahahaha) …. The truth is like a lion - it will defend itself.

2 Likes

Of course you havent posted a Space Station picture …..you cant ….wake up ‘rzn’, THERE ARENT ANY. hahaha