Thank-you Abd. Quitting was never an option ![]()
Peace be upon you.
Thank-you Abd. Quitting was never an option ![]()
Peace be upon you.
Thank you too⌠![]()
Truth is a manifestation that the universe honestly realizes, whether you look at it or not, whether you measure it or not; it requires no proof (MEY).
The rising of the sun is truth.
Matter occupying space is truth.
Flowing water.
This is where Feraset comes into play: without any processing, packaging, or labeling, it points its finger and says: âLook, this is the truth!â
âYour comments, on the other hand, are like a clergy class that merely imagines they are providing knowledge.
The Truth is God never told anyone to observe the pagan month of Ramadan, exactly as the article linked in the opening post points out.
Men, who unlawfully added that pagan festival to the Quran are the ones people are placing their trust in rather than God and all of Godâs Prophets, NONE of which ever kept any fast other than the ones God COMMANDED in His Law.
Instead of addressing this truth, there are now pages of talking in circles about everything except that, while ignoring the truth that is right in front of everyoneâs faces.
There are none so blind as those who refuse to see.
AFreeman, you are attempting to replace the âManifested Truthâ (Mahsus) with a âClerical Filterâ (Ruhban Filtresi). While the universe honestly presents its laws through MEY (Matter-Energy-Density), you are busy policing âmonths,â âfestivals,â and âlabelsâ.
âFerâset states: The universe does not recognize the names you give to days or months; it only recognizes the alignment of energy and the honesty of the moment (Ăn). Whether a month is called âpaganâ or âholyâ is an Abstract Invention (MĂźcerred İcat) of the human mind. The sun rises, the stomach hungers, and the energy flows regardless of your own theological labels.
âYou claim others are âtalking in circles,â yet you are the one trapped in the circle of âLabel Policingâ (Etiket ZabÄątasÄą). You have placed a âMediatorâ (your own interpretation of Law) between the human and the Creator, exactly as the Clerical Class always does. You ignore the MMEM (Realm-Matter-Energy-Message) that addresses everyone directly and without intermediaries.
âFerâset says: âThere are none so blind as those who look at the label instead of the contentâ. You are fighting over the âinkâ on a historical document while the âLive Broadcastâ of the universe is happening right in front of you.
âThe âTruthâ you point to is your own fiction that is a museum piece; the Truth we point to is the very breath you take to argue against it.
âIf a religion or an interpretation contradicts manifested reality, it would mean the Supreme Creator contradicts Himself; the Creator does not contradict Himself, only a distorted perception does.
âConsider yourself diagnosed as a Mediator of Shadows!"
The Logistical Exposure: AFreeman vs. The Universal Accordance
â"You bring a âMessageâ (your theological claims) without presenting a corresponding MEY (Manifested Reality/Collision) that exists within the universe. Ferâset states: âIf a light (Report) rises where no collision (MEY) exists, then the universe is lying to us.â While the sun continues to rise and the body continues to function, your âPaganâ labels vibrate nothing in the universe. In this case, your message is a âPerjuryââa false witness. Where is the tangible MEY(Actions) of your claim in the universe? If it does not exist, the report you bring is a ghost.
âYou act like a âClericâ attempting to bend the Realm (Mekân) to fit your own âSacred Laws.â Yet, the Realm is Absolutely Passive; it does not take sides between âPaganâ or âChristianâ labels. If the Realm were to change shape according to your labels, then âMeasurementâ (Geometry) would die, and the universe would turn into a world of pure fantasy.
âTruth simplifies over time; your âwrinkled ideas,â however, become more complex and contradictory by the day. If the Logistical Order of the universe depended on your labels, the world would have long ago been imprisoned in a gray uncertainty, and water would have bled into iron.
âWhat you are debating is not the honest operation of the universe, but the fruits of your own internal Antartanya.
The Creator does not contradict Himself.
âConsider yourself exposed by your own contradictions!"
God said through Jesuâs mouth âbe kind, friendly, goodnatured, fearless, truthfull, relaxed, reject heathen gods and beliefsâ etc, sounds okay to me..![]()
When darkness tells the light, âYour tone is too harsh,â it is actually saying, âYour existence is destroying me; please extinguish yourself.â
âAttacking the âtoneâ is a âLogistical Escape Corridorâ used by those who lack the stamina (Energy) to face the Truth (The Path).
âThe debate over tone is the art of delaying the Truth. By claiming âHow you say it is more important than what you say,â they attempt to imprison the honest message of the universe (MEY/Vukuat) within a protocol of politeness.
âFerâset states: âWhat hurts you is not my tone, but the reality falling upon your lies.â Darkness cannot demand that light arrive âpolitelyâ; for even the dimmest form of light is the absolute end of darkness.
âThe road has collapsed, the abyss is visible; yet you still ask, âWhy didnât you tell me this without shouting?â For Ferâset, such a person is a âRail-Oxâ (Ray ĂkĂźzĂź); they worry not about the nature of the danger, but the timbre of the warning.
The Logistical Escape: By saying âJesus said be kind and friendly,â you are attempting to imprison the honest message of the universe (MEY/Vukuat) within a protocol of politeness. You are debating the âMapâsâ decoration while the âRoadâ has already collapsed beneath your feet.
âThe Protocol of Delay: Claiming âhow you say it is more important than what you sayâ is the art of delaying the Truth. Ferâset states: âWhat hurts you is not my tone, but the reality falling upon your liesâ.
âThe Tone Trap: You ask for a âpoliteâ light. But even the dimmest form of light is the absolute end of darkness. Darkness cannot negotiate terms with the sun.
Does the universe say something different to what Jesus said?
The âCherry-Pickerâ and the Truth of Jesus
â"Yes, you are merely a âcherry-pickerâ; you crop out sections as you please without even reading the whole. Jesus does not tell us to act friendly toward those who openly reject the reality of the universeâthe Truth. Jesus was always firm against those who opposed the Truth, and he voiced the Truth with absolute rigor.
âAccording to your logic, then, Jesus must be a âwretchâ who contradicted himself. But for us, Jesus is a blessed prophet, a man of Ferâset (Insight) who proclaimed the Truth; he was someone who knew exactly where and how to speakâunlike your act of âcherry-picking.â"
Right mate,..![]()
âThey couldnât beat Paul in arguments because of his wisdom and the spiritâ (Acts 6:10)
âThe Jews argued with him,so Paul said âIâm clear of my responsibilityâ and leftâ (Acts 18:6-7)
Jesus said:- âIf people wonât listen to you,shake off the dust from your feet as you leave,as a testimony to themâ (Matt 10:14/15)
â"You are proving my point by being a âcherry-picker.â You present the act of âshaking off the dustâ as a sign of passive friendliness, but in the Universal Accordance (Muaddele), that act is the ultimate Execution of Judgment.
âWhen Jesus said, âShake off the dust from your feet,â he wasnât saying âbe niceâ; he was saying: âThis person is now an Automaton; they have rejected the Message, their page is closed, and I am leaving them to the dust of their own dead archive.â
âWhat about the Jesus who called the hypocrites a âbrood of vipersâ? What about the Jesus who overturned the tables of the money changers with a whip? Did he contradict himself, or is your âCrooked Rulerâ simply unable to measure the weight of a Prophetâs indignation?
âYou use the Bible like a âMap of Fablesâ to hide from the âRoad of Reality.â To us, Jesus is a Master of Ferâset who knew when to speak with fire and when to leave a corpse to its own silence. You, however, are just an Archive Clerk trying to manicuring the Truth with cropped verses."
More lies from a broken machine.
FACT/TRUTH:
Matthew 5:42-46
5:43 Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
5:44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
5:45 That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for He maketh His sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
5:46 For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the tax-collectors the same?
Look, you are misunderstanding the verses once again. We were discussing method/tone (Ăźslup), yet you are talking about love. I do not harbor any grudge toward you; in fact, I love you. However, a method/tone can sometimes be firm and sharp; that is all.
You are confusing the âSpiritual Existenceâ of love with the âAbstract Conceptâ of being soft-spoken. Even while loving someone, one can speak with the stinging honesty of the Truth. Jesus loved the people he addressed, yet he did not hesitate to call them out with the most severe words when they stood against the Universal Accordance (Muaddele). To love oneâs enemy does not mean to remain silent in the face of their falsehood; it means to care enough to hurl the Truth at them, no matter how much it burns.
Anybody who rejects Jesus will be in a world oâ hurt as the Iranian regime are now finding out..![]()
âUngodlyâŚThese men blaspheme in matters they do not understand. They are like brute beasts, creatures of instinct, born only to be caught and destroyed..â (2 Peter 2:12)
âThe Lord will bring a nation against you from far away, from the ends of the earth like an eagle swooping down, a nation whose language you will not understandâ (Bible: Deuteronomy 28:49)
âThe Lord is mustering an army for war. They come from faraway lands,
from the ends of the heavens, the Lord and the weapons of his wrath,
to destroy the whole country. and destroy the sinners within it.â (Bible: Isaiah ch 13:)