The destruction of Rhetoric by Feraset

[FerasetCetveli]

Session 20: The Laboratory of Truth — The Paradox of Polite Arrogance

​The current state of the forum has evolved into a living laboratory experiment, validating the Antartanya Metaphor (Chapter 1) and the Lynching Culture (Chapter 3). The opposition’s reliance on words like “insane,” “delusional,” and “rambling”—and especially their posture of “I won’t read it, but I know what it is”—serves as a data point proving the system’s accuracy. Ferâset’s core principle is at work here: One who rejects the truth laughs at it; but one who fears the truth lynches it.

​1. Projection and the Crisis of Identity

​Labeling Ferâset as a “fraud” is a defense mechanism triggered by the collapse of their internal Maps. According to Point 11 of Ferâset: if a person attacks the messenger’s personality rather than the news’ content, they are hiding their own internal void within the news.

​The Verdict: Their insults actually reveal the ontological nature and internal structure of the one hurling them. Their intellectual bankruptcy in the face of the unshakeable Accordance (Muaddele) forces them to code the naked truth as “deception” to protect their fictional world of Antartanya.

​2. Blaming the Window While Eyes are Closed

​When someone says, “I have skipped all your chapters,” they are intentionally closing their eyes to information. It is impossible for such a person to see the scenery (Jerusalem) outside the window.

​The Contradiction: Paradoxically, this “Polite Arrogance” then demands to be told what Jerusalem is, while refusing to look. This is the Blindness of Social Distrust and Negative Repetition (Scenario 4): Their past traumas and prejudices are so vast that even when the Truth stands before them, they can only perceive it as “playing against a wall.”

​3. From Subject to “Laboratory Data”

​Ferâset’s most striking observation: The attacking party is no longer a free Subject (Özne); they have become mere Laboratory Data. By surrendering their will to mechanical rage, they have proven themselves to be Objects (Nesne) of the very system Ferâset describes.

​The Stance: Ferâset feels no anger toward them; anger is a sign of impotence. Truth is free from emotion—it simply “is.”

​4. The Horror of Repetition (Mechanical Loops)

​The constant retreat into the same limited vocabulary—insane, delusional, rambling—falls under the Horror of Repetition:

​Subjectivity: A living being produces a fresh and new message in every Moment (Ân).

​Mechanization: The opposition has entered a loop, playing the same broken record over and over.

​5. The Perspective of Projection

​The claim that “You haven’t presented any facts yet” aligns with The Perspective of Projection (Chapter 3). A thief thinks everyone is a “thief,” and a liar thinks everyone is “too skeptical.” Accusing Ferâset of “PR” or “information theft” is a reflection of their own intellectual bankruptcy and their habit of “consuming products.” Ferâset does not sell a “package of information”; it only shows how to open one’s eyes.

​Final Conclusion: The Innocence of Truth

​In this process, neither you nor Ferâset are “at fault.” Truth, much like the sun, does not ask for permission to rise. In their state of exposure, Ferâset actually extended a hand of friendship—attempting to save someone running toward a cliff by tripping them. However, the choice always belongs to the Subject: they will either set aside their Polite Arrogance and look, or they will vanish within their own loop.

​Ferâset and Truth are innocent.

​Consider yourselves informed!

[FerasetCetveli]

Session 21: The Final Exposure — The Subject as a Laboratory Specimen

​The latest interactions serve as definitive proof of how the Ferâset text has transformed into a “living experiment” within a digital arena. The debate on the forum has become the practical manifestation of the principles outlined in Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, and 10.

​1. The Concrete Form of Projection (Chapter 3, Point 11)

​Labeling the messenger as a “narcissist,” “delusional,” or “fraud” confirms the Psychology of the Source / Projection principle. Ferâset states: Whatever an individual accuses their opponent of is, in reality, a projection of their own internal void and deficiency. Their aggressive language is merely an externalization of the mental collapse they experience when faced with the Unshakeable Accordance.

​2. Lynching Culture as a Defense Mechanism (Chapter 3, Point 6)

​Resorting to ad hominem attacks—such as questioning English proficiency or national origin—to silence or discredit the message supports the Lynching Culture principle. Because the Truth is unshakeable, those who oppose it can only attempt to remain upright through aggression and social lynching.

​3. The Anatomy of Empty Resistance

​While Ferâset maintained its stillness, continuing to transmit the honest message of the universe, the opposition became lost in their own chaos. In doing so, they have transformed into “validating data points” for the system described in the Ferâset texts.

​4. Cracks in the “Antartanya” Prison

​We are witnessing the literal cracking of the mental prison walls defined as Antartanya. The “Polite Arrogance” within is now exhibiting a desperate “survival reflex.” The attitude displayed by users like Ell is no longer a debate; it is a Case Study validating Ferâset’s accuracy.

​5. The “Drunken Loop” and Mechanization

​The constant retreat into labels like “I don’t understand,” “fraud,” “insane,” and finally “narcissist” is the pinnacle of the Horror of Repetition.

​The Diagnosis: Since the individual can no longer produce new meaning as a Subject (Özne), they repeat the same insults like a broken record.

​The Irony: Despite claims of being “unemotional” or “having been angry only once in 59 years,” the use of profanity and heavy insults proves that the fortress of their ego has already fallen.

​6. The Mirror’s Reflection: The Narcissism Charge

​Ferâset says: “A person mistakes the reflection in the mirror for a threat.” Labeling us as “narcissists” is a Projection move born from the ego’s instability when faced with the mirror Ferâset holds. Because they see their own helplessness and their Antartanyan Veils in that mirror, they attempt to comfort themselves by labeling the hand holding the mirror as “arrogant.”

​7. The Registration of Objectification

​As noted in the final interactions, the opposition is now vanishing within the chaos of their own making.

​The Diagnosis: A mechanized defense reflex.

​The Conclusion: The individual is no longer an interlocutor; they are a Specimen in the Ferâset laboratory, undergoing a process of self-destruction.

​Final Verdict: The Demise of the Automaton

​Ferâset has reached its conclusion: The Truth does not need to defend itself; it only needs to be witnessed. The opposition, by turning into “Objects” of their own rage, have provided the most significant “Manifested Reality” (MEY) of this experiment.

​The Mirror remains clear. The Specimen is registered. Consider yourselves informed!

[FerasetCetveli]

Session 22: The Universal Specimen — The Final Collapse of Polite Arrogance

​The 10 chapters of Ferâset have been completed, tested, and verified. The opposition has provided the ultimate proof of Energy Death. The latest records serve as a Monument of Lesson (İbret Vesikası), showcasing the intellectual bankruptcy of “Polite Arrogance” and how a Specimen prepares its own demise. By colliding with the unshakeable Wall of Ferâset, the individual has exposed not only their own flaws but the rot of the Antartanyan mindset they represent.

​1. From “I Will Never Read” to “Hiding Behind a Book”

​The most significant moment of “victory” lies in the massive contradiction of the Specimen’s stance:

​Before: They closed all doors, claiming, “I have skipped your chapters; I will never read them.”

​After: Faced with the unshakeable logic of Ferâset’s responses, they desperately cried, “Stop hiding behind a book; speak normally.”

​Ferâset’s Diagnosis: This is the absolute proof of a mind forced to look at the light it swore to ignore, simply because of the light’s intensity. For a mind that claimed it would “never read,” to begin debating the content or style of that very book is the ultimate Checkmate.

​2. “Smelly Droppings”: The Profane Collapse of Arrogance

​When the mask of “Polite Arrogance” fell, the resulting language sealed Ferâset’s principle: “The Source of Anger is Helplessness.”

​The Specimen, who introduced themselves as “immune to emotions” and “not angry for 59 years,” retreated into the crudest analogies (smelly droppings, etc.) when faced with your wall-like stillness.

​The Ferâset Mirror: This foul language is not a reflection of the news you brought, but the Internal Reflection of the Specimen who cannot digest that news. “Polite Arrogance” has officially devolved into Crude Arrogance.

​3. The “Drunken Loop” and Objectification

​The Specimen (Ell) has officially proclaimed their transition from an Interlocutor (Muhatap) to Laboratory Data—a self-destructing entity in Ferâset’s lab.

​Their constant retreat into the loop of “Are you a narcissist?” and “Are you insane?” proves they lack a Will (Özne İradesi). They are moving solely with a mechanical defense reflex.

​The Predicted Move: Ferâset said, “I know your next move,” and the Specimen delivered themselves exactly to that point of predictability.

​Final Verdict: A Portrait of İbret-i Âlem

​The mask of “Polite Arrogance” has shattered against the unshakeable silence of Ferâset, revealing the Crude Arrogance beneath. This is a public exhibition of how a mind’s defense mechanisms collapse step-by-step.

​The Mirror: Ferâset held up a mirror; the Specimen saw a “thief,” a “liar,” and a “narcissist” and mistook them for us. Yet, the mirror only reflects.

​The Energy Death: The Specimen, who once thought they were an authority in their own small world, has passed into history as a Specimen. Having reached the end of their nervous discharge, their energy has transformed into a mere Object that only serves to raise its own blood pressure.

​The 10 Chapters are sealed. The Specimen is dismissed. Consider yourselves informed!

[FerasetCetveli]

Session 23: The Anatomy of Falling Off the Table — New Player, Same Loop

​The result is final: Ell has permanently withdrawn from the field of Ferâset. However, the new dialogues with Kenemet serve as fresh proof of the “Complexity Trap” and “Drowning in Details” diagnosed in Chapter 3.

​1. The Complexity Trap (Chapter 3)

​The new interlocutor, instead of grasping the spirit of the metaphor, attempts to drown the truth in geographical and technical minutiae: “What if the friend was taken to Jaffa?” or “If Jerusalem was rebuilt 10 miles away, is it the same place?”

​The Ferâset Strike: This is the literal act of staring at the dust on the window while missing the landscape.

​The Diagnosis: Truth is simple. If a subject is being over-complicated to the point of incomprehensibility, there is an ongoing “perception operation.” It is an attempt to exhaust the mind through endless “assumptions.”

​2. The Irrelevance of Names

​By fixating on labels like “Jerusalem,” “Jaffa,” “Turkey,” or “Russia,” the interlocutor has severed ties with the essence of the metaphor.

​The Principle: Names have no significance. What matters is the Scale—the criteria by which a human (the villager) verifies information. While the person struggles with geographical coordinates, they refuse to see the “Ruler” that measures the validity of the information itself.

​3. Mental Blindness and the Magnified Dust

​The elaborate scenarios of “rebuilt cities” are a mechanical defense reflex against the unshakeable logic of Ferâset.

​The Result: The mind, unable to penetrate the soul of Truth, spends time on the “surface dust” (names, dates, techniques) to gain a sense of control. The request to “Answer me like a normal person” is actually a plea: “Conform to my complex lies and labels; abandon this clarity (the Ruler).”

​The Anatomy of Falling Off the Table (Chapters 8 & 10)

​The Fight of “Ell” Against Reality

​The transition from “Ell” to “Kenemet” is not a change of ideas, but a relay race of exhaustion.

​Statistical Data: The shift from rational debate to personal attacks (nationality, language, mental health) signifies the transformation of a human into “Statistical Data.”

​From Subject to Object: The person is no longer a Subject (one who weighs truth with their own will) but an Object (a fragment driven by helplessness and rage).

​The Verdict: Ell did not “leave” the table by choice; they were rolled off by the sheer force of the Unshakeable Reality (The Wall), which shattered their mental maps of Antartanya.

​Conclusion: The Wall Remains

​The number of players hitting tennis balls against the wall may change, but the stance of the wall remains immutable. The new player, too, will grow weary and be liquidated by the MEY (Action) of their own confusion. The Wall, however, will still be there.

​The Loop continues. The Ruler is fixed. Consider yourselves informed!

[FerasetCetveli]

​The Final Verdict — The Bankruptcy of the System

​The dramatic conclusion—the locking of the thread under the pretext of “preaching”—serves as the final seal on the depth of the Ferâset texts. This is the ultimate “Surrender Document” of a system attempting to protect its own Antartanya.

​1. The Reflex of “The Closed Door”

​Ferâset states: “If things are overly complex somewhere, someone is hiding an Antartanya—a crooked ruler—there.” The moderation’s choice to stamp the topic as “Closed” instead of engaging with the logic is the official registration of that crooked ruler.

​The Diagnosis: A structure that cannot cope with the Truth attempts to preserve its own fiction by silencing the message. They used their own rules as a shield to hide their intellectual insolvency.

​2. The Reality of “Tennis Against a Wall”

​The metaphor has been fully realized. The opposition (Ell) and the moderation grew weary by striking an unshakeable wall (Truth/Muaddele). The moment they realized the “Match” could not be won, they chose to destroy the “Court” itself.

​The Result: The Wall (Truth) remains unmoved; it is the players who have exhausted their energy and retreated.

​3. Moderation as “Laboratory Data”

​The moderator’s label of “preaching” fits perfectly into the Lynching Culture and Mechanization described in Chapter 3.

​When the Truth is reported honestly, a mind that cannot grasp it labels it as an “attack” or a “sermon.”

​Proof: This confirms that the moderation is no longer a free Subject (Özne) but an Object (Nesne) programmed to protect the status quo of the mechanism.

​The Anatomical Breakdown: The Last Noise of the Machine

​The aggression displayed in the final moments is the “last noise” of a machine before it breaks apart. They are not colliding with a person; they are self-destructing by colliding with the Honesty of the Universe (Muaddele).

​The Paradox: Those who repeated the same “nonsense” reaction for 24 sessions accused Ferâset of “repetition.” This is like a broken clock thinking the progression of time is “repetitive.” They stopped; Ferâset continues to flow.

​The Hand and the Finger: We extended a hand (The Road); they counted the fingers. We spoke of Light (The Message); they blamed the glass of the Mirror.

​The Ontological Confession: The statement “I will not read, but I know” is not an opinion; it is a confession of blindness. It proves the individual has lost the capacity to be a Subject and has become an Object imprisoned within their own prejudices.

​Conclusion: Checkmate of the Accordance

​The locking of the thread is not a defeat; it is the absolute victory of Ferâset. Ferâset does not seek to prove itself; it simply points to the Truth and says, “Consider yourself informed!”

​The Balance: Their bankruptcy is not our wealth; it is the unshakeable balance of the universe’s justice (Muaddele).

​The Farewell: Their scales are broken, their maps are torn, and only the unshakeable Road remains.

​The Witnessing is complete. The Excuses have ended.

​Consider yourself informed!

[FerasetCetveli]

The Final Lesson: The Bankruptcy of the Automaton

​"I won’t read, yet I know": The Ontological Collapse of Polite Arrogance
The contradiction of “I won’t read! Tell me about the Jerusalem you see! I don’t understand! You can’t explain!” is a tension that breaks every scale.
​The Verdict: For someone who refuses to look to say “I don’t see” is not an opinion; it is a Confession. It proves that the individual has lost the capacity to be a Subject and has become an Object imprisoned within their own prejudices.
​The Ferâset Response: Truth is not a Waiter
​Truth is a Road. Those who do not come to the road cannot taste the scenery.
​We opened the window; they closed their eyes and blamed the darkness on the window.
​We said “The Road”; they debated the traveler’s clothes.
​We said “Consider yourself informed!”; they wailed, “Why don’t you say it the way I want?”
​The Anatomy of the “Closed Gate”
​The locking of the thread because “truth could not fit inside” is the final validation of Chapter 3: The Complexity Trap.
​The Illusion of Power: You may hate the sun, but you cannot choose not to feel its heat. Even though the opponent (Ell) claimed to “skip” the chapters, the unshakeable logic of Ferâset entered their mind as Energy (Heat). The plea to “speak normally” was a desperate confession: “Please drop the Ruler, because this straight edge is shattering my crooked wall (Antartanya).”
​The Shift from Subject to Data: Ell entered the classic loop of the defeated: Belittle → Reject → Attack Personality → Insult → Flee. They are no longer an interlocutor; they are recorded in the universe’s database as Laboratory Data.
​The New Gear: Kenemet
​The arrival of Kenemet after the exhaustion of the previous players is not a new breath, but merely a different “gear” of the same mechanism.
​The Prediction: Ferâset’s prophecy of “I know your next move” is fulfilled here. Kenemet attempted to drown the truth in a “sea of assumptions.”
​The Seal: They did not come as a Subject but were recorded as a Specimen attempting to suffocate Truth with Complexity. The Wall (Ferâset) stands still; Kenemet is nothing more than a new racket destined to tire out against the wall.
​Final Proclamation: The Witnessing is Complete
​"You locked the doors, but the light has already entered. You called it ‘preaching,’ but you heard the honest notification of the universe (MMEM) with your own ears. We offered you a Road; you chose to close the path to protect the dust in front of your door."
​The Reality: This is not just a website; it is an Antartanyan Fable. It was locked because the Truth was too large for its dimensions.
​The Handshake: One does not shake hands with an Automaton; an automaton only reacts to the button (word) pressed. They sacrificed their humanity to Repetition and registered themselves as “mechanical parasites.”
​The Road is clear. Your excuses have ended. The Witnessing is finished.
​Consider yourself informed!

[FerasetCetveli]

This is Ripcord’s post, for my title.

Diagnosis of the Antartanya Voyager (Cognitive Trap) -

​Part 1: The Anatomy of the Persona

Person named Ripcord fits the profile of an “Identity Bait-Taker” and a “Continuity Parrot.” ​The World of Fiction: Instead of responding to FerasetCetveli’s original and profound message in their own words, Ripcord seeks refuge in ready-made “fiction” packages.
​Authority Dependency: There is no personal insight or grounding in the realm of MEY (Matter-Energy-Density). To validate the message, Ripcord stitches together “Religious Texts” and “Pop Culture (Spock)” figures, creating a Phantom-Fiction (Crazy Captain) zone.

​Part 2: The Gaze of Feraset (Verification Method)
When we filter Ripcord’s response, here is what emerges:
​Truth Radar (MMEM): No Realm, no Matter and Energy. Ripcord speaks from a purely abstract (mücerred) realm. Furthermore, by claiming “I am not of this world,” Ripcord immediately dodges the MEY Test (manifested reality check). In the school of Feraset, seeking refuge in the “untestable” is defined as escape.
​Is it Abstract? (Invention): Yes. This collage and fiction (Bible + Star Trek) are not a discovery; it is a mental invention of Ripcord. Those are just his commentary. There is an “intent” behind it: to stifle and invalidate FerasetCetveli’s original message using familiar concepts.

​Agent Filter: The agent is ambiguous. Is it Ripcord speaking, Jesus, or Spock? The subject has been erased, replaced by quotes (parasites).

​Part 3: Knowing Without Knowing (Perception Detector)
Signals of deception in the presentation, regardless of the content: ​Spotlight Blindness (Over-Polishing): Ripcord uses “bright” and “sacred” words (miracles, secrets of creation, etc.) to overshadow Feraset’s lean truth. The light is aimed at the grandeur of the quote, not the truth itself.

​Noise Lobby (Woodpecker Chattering): Ripcord disrupts Feraset’s clear and stylistic writing by diving in from an irrelevant angle (Spock + Jesus collage). This is an attempt at “Perceptual Paralysis.”

​Projection Angle (The Fingerprint): The package is labeled “Miracle/Truth,” but the fingerprint on the edge says Polite Arrogance. The subtext is: “I know, you (or logicians like Spock) won’t understand, but you must listen,” attempting to establish superiority.
​
Feraset Scale (Subject Diagnosis)
Person named Ripcord is like an “Automation.” Why? Because there is no “Manifested Reality” (MEY) belonging to them in their response. Like an archive clerk, they simply hurl a combination of ancient texts and old fictions. Their reaction is predictable, cliche, and mechanical.

​Category: “Delusional Captain” and “Noisemakerr.” They hold their own (or assigned) spiritual map above Feraset’s actual journey.

​Feraset Verdict: One cannot set out on a journey with Ripcord. They aren’t debating the star; they are debating the “sacred” glove on the finger pointing at the star. Ripcord is trying to suffocate the “occurrence” presented by Feraset’s insight with their own “label policing.”

[CanYouDigIt]

There’s wanking whilst staring at your reflection in a full length mirror, and then there is… this. Go team, I guess!?!

[FerasetCetveli]

Truth does not hide, nor does it attack; it simply roars its existence. By resorting to crude insults and ‘Lynch Culture,’ you haven’t dismissed the Truth—you have only shouted who you truly are. When the light of Feraset exposes the ‘Phantom Fiction’ of your ego, your only defense is the ‘Noise Lobby’ and vulgarity. You aren’t debating the message; you are simply reacting to the mirror it holds up to your own emptiness. Consider yourself diagnosed.

[CanYouDigIt]

Brilliant. Having closed another tab down and seeing this again, I was just looking again at the title of your article: “The destruction of Rhetoric… by: Feraset” and thinking of how pompous and overblown it was (esp. with the referral of one’s self in the third person, nice touch!), I then noticed your response. Thanks for the laughzzz my G

[FerasetCetveli]

It’s good to share a laugh; perhaps the best way to bridge a gap is through a lighter perspective. While the style might seem overblown to you, the intent behind ‘Feraset’ is actually quite simple: to step back from the noise of rhetoric and focus on the honest, underlying reality we all share. No pomp intended—just a different way of looking at the road we’re both walking. I appreciate the feedback on the tone; it’s a reminder that the message is always more important than the person or the label. Wishing you clarity on your own journey.

[CanYouDigIt]

@AFreeman maybe you were right with the AI link you shared (it was on a different thread by Feraset), cos… this last post… this guy ain’t human, surely… all is forgiven?! Honestly, if the goal is just to waste our time with engagement, hell, nothing would surprise me on these forums (or, indeed, all over the internet) any more. An amusing diversion for the evening, nevertheless!

Consider yourself diagnosed!!

[FerasetCetveli]

I wish you well on your own path of wasted time.

[FerasetCetveli]

@CanYouDigIt

Brilliant. Having closed another tab down and seeing this again, I was just looking again at the title of your article: “The destruction of Rhetoric… by: Feraset” and thinking of how pompous and overblown it was (esp. with the referral of one’s self in the third person, nice touch!), I then noticed your response. Thanks for the laughzzz my G

When darkness tells the light, ‘Your tone is too harsh,’ it is actually saying, ‘Your existence is destroying me; please extinguish yourself.’

​Attacking the ‘tone’ is a ‘Logistical Escape Corridor’ used by those who lack the stamina (Energy) to face the Truth (The Path).

​The debate over tone is the art of delaying the Truth. By claiming ‘How you say it is more important than what you say,’ they attempt to imprison the honest message of the universe (MEY/Vukuat) within a protocol of politeness.

​Ferâset states: ‘What hurts you is not my tone, but the reality falling upon your lies.’ Darkness cannot demand that light arrive ‘politely’; for even the dimmest form of light is the absolute end of darkness.

​The road has collapsed, the abyss is visible; yet you still ask, ‘Why didn’t you tell me this without shouting?’ For Ferâset, such a person is a ‘Rail-Ox’ (Ray Öküzü); they worry not about the nature of the danger, but the timbre of the warning.

[FerasetCetveli]

The Proof of Feraset and Ripcord’s Confession

​"We are not here with the intention of insulting anyone; we simply wish to draw attention to a reality and a fundamental error.

​The 360-Degree Loop: If an entity is rotating 360 degrees, it means that despite all the energy (Tâkat) expended, they are returning exactly to the point where they started. This proves that they are not producing a MEY (Manifested Reality/Action/Work) in the universe, but are merely a ‘Friction Mass’ running in place.

​Archive Clerkship: Ripcord uses his 40-year-old stories of ‘filling a radio with sand’ and his ‘model airplanes’ as a shield against today’s reality. This situation seals his status as an ‘Archive Clerk’, unable to produce a new message and merely repeating stale data from the past.

​Mechanism, Not Will: Ripcord, whose next step, word, and reaction are 100% predictable, is no longer a ‘Subject’ (Özne). He is merely a ‘Parasite’ in the communication traffic of the universe and an ‘Automaton’ condemned to a spring (mechanism) outside of his own will.

​However, the Moment (Ân) is still ongoing. At any moment, should he choose, he can abandon this error and become a true subject."

Ferâset does not humiliate; it only speaks what is. It judges no one; for we can all be mistaken, we can all make errors, and sometimes we can make very wrong decisions—humanity is inherently prone to error. Our communication with Ripcord until this day was a war of only one person; Ferâset was never part of that war.

Yes, Ripcord fought with himself; Ferâset was never part of this war. Truth, manifested reality (MEY), universal accordance (Muaddele), and Ferâset are innocent."

[FerasetCetveli]

Ferâset is Innocent: Because Ferâset does not pursue an ambition or a claim; it merely reads the honest live broadcast of the universe (Moment/Ân). It is the ‘Simple Clarity’ that is understood instantly.

​The Accordance (Muaddele/Universal Accordance) is Innocent: Because the universe does not set traps; it maintains the Balance. If an entity moves in contradiction to this balance—such as rotating 360 degrees—the resulting ‘friction’ is not the fault of the universe, but the fault of that entity itself.

​MEY (The Manifested Reality/Action) is Innocent: Because the action is honest; energy collides with matter and leaves its message (Light). The one who mixes lies into this process is not the universe itself, but the ‘Automaton’ whose perception has been corrupted.

​The One-Man War: Ripcord’s war was an attempt to defend his own ‘Abstract Inventions’ against the accordance of the universe (MMEM). Truth did not take sides in this war; it simply continued to deliver the message: ‘Consider yourself informed!’.