New Here - Expert On 9/11 & More - Thread Open To All

[GeoffreyMortonJr]

@Ripcord

Let me blow the “Muslims never did 9/11” consp-theory out of the water by pointing out that Muslim terrorists had been killing Americans and other people around the world for many years, so America DIDN’T NEED to fake 9/11 as an excuse for going into the mideast because they ALREADY HAD good reason to go in and kick terrorist ass..:).

And, yet, despite the fact that there are indeed many jihadists in the world, Muslims didn’t do 9/11. U.S. and lsraeIi spies did.

The biggest terrorists in the world are at ClA headquarters at LangIey and Mоssad headquarters in TeI Aviv.

To me it looks like this thread has been infested with idiots at best - and at worst, some of you are trying to deliberately poison the well here.

I don’t really care about that. There will always be spies and idiots out there.

But I do care about the notion that this thread may be attracting watchers who will take the news back up the ladder to the Rоthschilds and their own masters at the Vаtican that the psyops aren’t working.

[AFreeman]

9/11 (September 11, 2001) was unquestionably an inside job.

It was the watershed event that began the “endless wars” that have been experienced ever since.

This is exactly what would be expected of the dying American empire, in its final throes.

It is a physical impossibility for steel skyscrapers to suffer impacts and/or explosions near the top and collapse “due to fire” in their own footprint at near free-fall speed.

No steel skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire; not before 9/11, not after 9/11, nor on 9/11.

These were controlled demolitions (WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7), for which billions in insurance claims were paid out.

That, of course, included payouts to counterfeit-Jew Larry Silverstein, who became the lease holder of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 (among others) just a few months before their controlled demolition (sold to the American public as a “terrorist attack”).

On April 26 of 2001 the Board of Commissioners for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey awarded Silverstein Properties and mall-owner Westfield America a 99-year-lease on the following assets: The Twin Towers, World Trade Center Buildings 4 and 5, two 9-story office buildings, and 400,000 square feet of retail space.

The partners’ winning bid was $3.2 billion for holdings estimated to be worth more than $8 billion. JP Morgan Chase, a prestigious investment-bank that’s the flagship firm of its kind for Rockefeller family interests, advised the Port Authority, another body long influenced by banker and builder David Rockefeller, his age then 85, in the negotiations.

The lead partner and spokesperson for the winning bidders, Larry Silverstein, age 70, already controlled more than 8 million square feet of New York City real estate. WTC 7 and the nearby Equitable Building were prime among these prior holdings. Larry Silverstein also owned Runway 69, a nightclub in Queens that was alleged 9 years ago to be laundering money made through sales of Laotian heroin.

---

War is a very lucrative businesses for the military industrial complex, and an event like 9/11 made the war profiteers hundreds of billions, while distracting the public from the $2.3 trillion that Rumsfeld announced on September 10 was missing from the Pentagon budget office that was torpedoed the next day.

[AFreeman]

9/11 Conspiracy Theory Explained in 5 Minutes!!

[Ripcord]

And, yet, despite the fact that there are indeed many jihadists in the world, Muslims didn’t do 9/11. U.S. and lsraeIi spies did..

==============================================

Well why have Al-Qaeda ADMITTED doing 9/11?

[Ripcord]

9/11 (September 11, 2001) was unquestionably an inside job.

==================================================

You’ll be telling us next that Mary Poppins did it..: ..OH WAIT, this startling new footage has just emerged!-

[Ripcord]

@AFreeman

No steel skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire; not before 9/11, not after 9/11, nor on 9/11.

=================================================================

There’s a saying in the construction industry- “Never trust a truss”, because if one melts in a fire they all fail concertina fashion…Here are stills from a scientific TV investigation of 9/11 showing how the heat made the W-shaped trusses in the towers buckle and gave way-

[GeoffreyMortonJr]

@Ripcord

Well why have Al-Qaeda ADMITTED doing 9/11?

You mean al-ClAda? “al-Qaeda” literally started as the database of mujahedin fighters loyal to the ClA during Operation Cyclone.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cyclone

Good Lord, man. Wake up. Osama bin Laden secretly toured U.S. military bases under the name “Tim Osman”. He was always a ClA asset.

[AFreeman]

Excerpt below from:

9-11 Research: The Truss Failure Theory

The Truss Failure Theory

Theory Invented to Sidestep Problems With Column Failure Theory

The FEMA-endorsed truss failure theory purports to explain the collapses of the Twin Towers with an account of a series of events that supposedly initiated the collapses. It was apparently invented to address the most obvious shortcoming of the column failure theory: that the temperatures of the fires were not nearly high enough to weaken the columns enough to cause them to fail.

NOVA and Dr. Eagar Team Up to Sell the Truss Theory

One of the principal promoters of the truss theory is Dr. Thomas Eagar, a professor of materials engineering at MIT. He co-authored an article in JOM and gave an interview to NOVA , which appears on their website. Though he probably can’t claim credit for the truss theory, he might be credited for the zipper theory, which purports to explain the failure of all of the trusses on a floor in quick succession:

Once you started to get angle clips to fail in one area, it put extra load on other angle clips, and then it unzipped around the building on that floor in a matter of seconds.

The graphics for the NOVA article are interesting for what they leave out.

• The animation, which shows the beginning of the unzipping chain reaction, doesn’t show the cross trusses, which ran perpendicular to the falling trusses.

• The animation implies that the floors simply rested on the trusses. In fact the tops of the trusses were bolted to the corrugated steel pans underlaying the concrete floor slabs.

• 
  The core is depicted as a stack of slabs, rather than a bundle of columns. How interesting that an article purporting to explain the collapses omits the most basic element of the tower’s structural system.

• The building that the plane is flying into at the same roll angle as the North Tower hit has prominent horizontal ribs and barely visible vertical lines. So much the better for pancaking!

• The size of the plane relative to the tower would be correct if the plane were a 747, which has over twice the mass of the 767-200 thought to have hit the tower.

Also absent from the article are any actual pictures of the buildings being leveled. How thoughtful of them to replace those unpleasant exploding clouds of dust with nice clean computer animations.

Having been promoted by a trusted popular science television program, the truss theory is accepted by the vast majority of Americans who have bothered to wonder about how the towers collapsed, despite more and less obvious flaws in the theory.

[Scout]

@Ripcord

Let me blow the “Muslims never did 9/11” consp-theory out of the water by pointing out that Muslim terrorists had been killing Americans and other people around the world for many years

So why invade Iraq?

The Bin laden video was more of a fake than your “mary poppins” pic

[Ripcord]

Good Lord, man. Wake up. Osama bin Laden secretly toured U.S. military bases under the name “Tim Osman”. He was always a ClA asset.

===================================================

Aargh please, not another consp-theory..

PS- Al-Qaeda have never said openly to the world “We never done 9/11” so why don’t they simply say that?

[GeoffreyMortonJr]

@Ripcord

Aargh please, not another consp-theory..

Are you lost, little girl? Do you think you’re on X or Facebook or BlueSky?

If you want the mainstream media to pour lies down your throat and tell you we’re all “conspiracy theorists”, major social media - itself largely a creation of the ClA as well! - will be happy to oblige you.

This is Vigilant Citizen. People come here to learn the truth. I will not censor what I know because you’re offended.

[GeoffreyMortonJr]

Again, I encourage any skeptics to visit the finest resource I know on the coverup:

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/Israel_did_it

[Kidkip]

And here we have another one who drank gallons of msm ‘koolaid’ … and REALLY liked it ….let me count the number of countries the ‘coulda been great’ usa have attacked and ‘democratised’ the shit out of …..….Oh, shit, I’ve run out of fingers and toes - I still have more to add - including Venezuela. Muslims attacking amerika ….give me a break.

[Kidkip]

Well we aint gonna get any ‘truth’ from the Geoffrey Morton JUNIOR Bot ….hahaha what a waste of space this thing is ….and your vaunted source ‘wikispooks’ …is this comedy hour …you probably think wikiLEAKS is the ‘real deal’ and that the faggot Assange isn’t a CIA asset …yeah - course ya do hahaha.

[Ripcord]

Even Al-Qaeda says it’s ridiculous to say they never did 9/11…

[Ripcord]

Islam has been slaughtering people for years, their Koran puts them up to it..:)-

[Orwells_mentor]

This is a good resource, thanks! We had a couple of threads on the previous iteration of these boards that discussed 9/11. The oldest one, which evidently had the most information, was the one regarding the former CIA agent confessing on his deathbed that they were involved in the attacks.

I’ll look through my bookmarks to see if I’ve saved any from that thread. However, @UnderAlienControl has posted Christopher Bollyn’s video and I find he’s one of the most resourceful journalists regarding the Mossad and CIA connections to the event.

[Karlysymon]

@Kidkip

There was however a tiny bit of footage around for a while that seemed to show a cruise type missile impacting. Remember there was NO wreckage consistent with a large passenger jet around the ‘pentagram’ - and we all know how much wreckage a large airliner leaves. Of course, in reality if any large passenger aircraft had hit the world trade centre buildings there isn’t a hope in hell that they would have penetrated to very heavy steel work but, instead would have crashed down the face of the building and produced a mega pile of wreckage on the ground.

I don’t fall in either camp (planes were used/there were no planes) because frankly, i don’t really care about those details. A couple weeks ago, i came across comments made by Michael Aquino on 9/11 (you can find a longer video on youtube but this one is 6mins) and after watching/listening to the thing, i thought to myself: if the towers could be rigged with explosives (nano-thermite) why not the planes…so they could be incinerated on impact leaving no wreckage? I’ve been in conspiracies many years and i’ve never heard anyone even advance that theory. So i wanted to ask the “no planes” believers to satisfy my curiosity that planes can’t be rigged with nanothermite and it was all holograms.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzE6ZN9gGrE

[Possible]

Ignore that rip cord dude. I heard he’s a sex offender hence the fake Christian posing on the internet. I reported him to VC but apparently he hasn’t been banned because there is zero moderation here.

[GeoffreyMortonJr]

“@UnderAlienControl has posted Christopher Bollyn’s video and I find he’s one of the most resourceful journalists regarding the Mossad and CIA connections to the event.”

I feel the same way! Bollyn’s work is great - Gage’s too - there are a few honest people out there still telling the truth about all this.

@Orwells_mentor

The oldest one, which evidently had the most information, was the one regarding the former CIA agent confessing on his deathbed that they were involved in the attacks.

I’m really not surprised. I’ve had it confessed by several behind-the-scenes personnel myself that 9/11 was an inside job.

What it shows more than anything else is what a sham our national news outlets really have become. The conspiracy to cover up the role of the “dancing lsraeIis” is profound, and goes all the way up to the New York Times.